https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264214 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai set aside the impugned order due to the lack of specificity in the show-cause notices issued by the revenue, which failed to provide a detailed breakdown of the amounts attributable to each service. The tribunal found that the vague notices vitiating the proceedings, as they did not discuss the allegations from the audit report or the appellant's response, nor did they provide reasons for disallowing specific services as input services. Consequently, the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant with any consequential benefits. en-us Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264214 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai set aside the impugned order due to the lack of specificity in the show-cause notices issued by the revenue, which failed to provide a detailed breakdown of the amounts attributable to each service. The tribunal found that the vague notices vitiating the proceedings, as they did not discuss the allegations from the audit report or the appellant's response, nor did they provide reasons for disallowing specific services as input services. Consequently, the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant with any consequential benefits. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264214