<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 881 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264213</link>
    <description>Validly earned and accumulated CENVAT credit under the earlier regime remained admissible after the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 came into force, because Rule 9 treated unutilised pre-existing credit as credit available under the new rules and permitted its utilisation accordingly. Rule 6 was construed as restricting credit on inputs used in exempted goods only for the period when the new regime operated, and not as retrospectively extinguishing credit already validly taken. As the statute did not clearly provide for retrospective reversal, the accumulated credit was held indefeasible and could not be denied; the assessee was entitled to utilise the entire credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2015 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 881 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264213</link>
      <description>Validly earned and accumulated CENVAT credit under the earlier regime remained admissible after the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 came into force, because Rule 9 treated unutilised pre-existing credit as credit available under the new rules and permitted its utilisation accordingly. Rule 6 was construed as restricting credit on inputs used in exempted goods only for the period when the new regime operated, and not as retrospectively extinguishing credit already validly taken. As the statute did not clearly provide for retrospective reversal, the accumulated credit was held indefeasible and could not be denied; the assessee was entitled to utilise the entire credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>