<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 879 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264211</link>
    <description>Exemption from additional excise duty on tea purchased from small growers depended on proof that the seller was a small grower holding less than 10 hectares. The existing record did not contain the land documents needed to establish that status, so the exemption claim could not be accepted on merits. However, the matter was remanded to the assessing authority to allow the petitioner an opportunity to produce the necessary land records and have the claim reconsidered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 879 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264211</link>
      <description>Exemption from additional excise duty on tea purchased from small growers depended on proof that the seller was a small grower holding less than 10 hectares. The existing record did not contain the land documents needed to establish that status, so the exemption claim could not be accepted on merits. However, the matter was remanded to the assessing authority to allow the petitioner an opportunity to produce the necessary land records and have the claim reconsidered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>