https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264203 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the provisional release of goods subject to bond execution and deposit. The petitioner's claims of mis-declaration, excess goods, and mala-fide conduct by customs officials were not upheld. The court directed the petitioner to pursue the appeal process under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962, emphasizing the availability of appeal remedy for resolving the dispute over goods' release and valuation issues. en-us Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jan 2016 11:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264203 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the provisional release of goods subject to bond execution and deposit. The petitioner's claims of mis-declaration, excess goods, and mala-fide conduct by customs officials were not upheld. The court directed the petitioner to pursue the appeal process under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962, emphasizing the availability of appeal remedy for resolving the dispute over goods' release and valuation issues. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264203