<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 869 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264201</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals by way of remand, emphasizing procedural fairness and the need for a thorough examination of evidence in cases involving alleged customs violations. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority to reevaluate the case, ensuring proper opportunities for hearing and addressing requests for cross-examination and document provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 06:02:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 869 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264201</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals by way of remand, emphasizing procedural fairness and the need for a thorough examination of evidence in cases involving alleged customs violations. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority to reevaluate the case, ensuring proper opportunities for hearing and addressing requests for cross-examination and document provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>