<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 867 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264199</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal seeking to impose a penalty on an importer for the misdeeds of an employee during customs clearance. Citing previous decisions and emphasizing that penalizing the importer was unwarranted as they had paid the necessary duties and interest, the Tribunal held that the importer should not be held liable for the actions of their clearing agent&#039;s employee. The appeal was dismissed, following precedent and observations from similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 867 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264199</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal seeking to impose a penalty on an importer for the misdeeds of an employee during customs clearance. Citing previous decisions and emphasizing that penalizing the importer was unwarranted as they had paid the necessary duties and interest, the Tribunal held that the importer should not be held liable for the actions of their clearing agent&#039;s employee. The appeal was dismissed, following precedent and observations from similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>