<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 859 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264191</link>
    <description>Special leave was granted where the High Court had relied on Balaji Shipping U.K. Ltd., and the petition was directed to be connected with Civil Appeal No. 9504 of 2013 for a consolidated hearing. The alleged distinction between the relevant Belgium Treaty article and the Indo-U.K. Treaty provision was not decided at this stage. The Court reserved that interpretive question for consideration with the connected matters, leaving the treaty-comparison issue open until hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 859 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264191</link>
      <description>Special leave was granted where the High Court had relied on Balaji Shipping U.K. Ltd., and the petition was directed to be connected with Civil Appeal No. 9504 of 2013 for a consolidated hearing. The alleged distinction between the relevant Belgium Treaty article and the Indo-U.K. Treaty provision was not decided at this stage. The Court reserved that interpretive question for consideration with the connected matters, leaving the treaty-comparison issue open until hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>