<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 848 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264180</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed both appeals by the Revenue as the expenses were deemed to be business promotion expenses and the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusions on excessive expenditure lacked proper justification. The Court held that the factual findings by the Tribunal did not raise the legal questions presented. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 06:00:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 848 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264180</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed both appeals by the Revenue as the expenses were deemed to be business promotion expenses and the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusions on excessive expenditure lacked proper justification. The Court held that the factual findings by the Tribunal did not raise the legal questions presented. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>