<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 844 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264176</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee did not have a Permanent Establishment (PE) or a Service PE in India under the Indo-UK DTAA. As a result, the distribution revenues were not taxable in India. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify the applicability of interest under Section 234D.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 05:59:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 844 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264176</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee did not have a Permanent Establishment (PE) or a Service PE in India under the Indo-UK DTAA. As a result, the distribution revenues were not taxable in India. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify the applicability of interest under Section 234D.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>