<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 840 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264172</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order in a tax dispute case, dismissing the grounds of both the assessee and the department. The ITAT found precedent in previous cases to support the decisions made regarding additions on interest on Post Dated Cheques, disallowance on additional payments for land purchase, disallowance under section 40A(3) for cash payments, and additions under section 2(22)(e) for deemed dividends. The judgments ensured consistency and uniformity in applying legal principles to similar tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2015 06:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 840 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264172</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order in a tax dispute case, dismissing the grounds of both the assessee and the department. The ITAT found precedent in previous cases to support the decisions made regarding additions on interest on Post Dated Cheques, disallowance on additional payments for land purchase, disallowance under section 40A(3) for cash payments, and additions under section 2(22)(e) for deemed dividends. The judgments ensured consistency and uniformity in applying legal principles to similar tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>