<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 935 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173632</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the appeal as the assessee proved the legitimacy of companies investing in its share capital. The court stated that if the companies received cash deposits, the Income Tax Department should address it. Reference was made to Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Lovely Exports Pvt. Ltd. (216 CTR 195).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:30:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 935 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173632</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the appeal as the assessee proved the legitimacy of companies investing in its share capital. The court stated that if the companies received cash deposits, the Income Tax Department should address it. Reference was made to Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Lovely Exports Pvt. Ltd. (216 CTR 195).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>