<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 935 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173632</link>
    <description>Where an assessee produced shareholders&#039; bank accounts, incorporation certificates and income-tax returns, and thereby established the identity and genuineness of the share subscribers, addition on account of share application money was not justified merely because cash had been deposited in the subscribers&#039; bank accounts before cheques were issued. The unexplained cash deposits, if any, were a matter for action against the subscribing companies and not a basis for addition in the assessee&#039;s hands. Applying the principle in Lovely Exports, no substantial question of law arose on the revenue&#039;s challenge, and the addition was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:30:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 935 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173632</link>
      <description>Where an assessee produced shareholders&#039; bank accounts, incorporation certificates and income-tax returns, and thereby established the identity and genuineness of the share subscribers, addition on account of share application money was not justified merely because cash had been deposited in the subscribers&#039; bank accounts before cheques were issued. The unexplained cash deposits, if any, were a matter for action against the subscribing companies and not a basis for addition in the assessee&#039;s hands. Applying the principle in Lovely Exports, no substantial question of law arose on the revenue&#039;s challenge, and the addition was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>