<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (1) TMI 25 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173623</link>
    <description>Where a business continued without discontinuance and was succeeded by an individual, a notice under section 34(1) addressed to the firm remains a valid assessment notice and the successor is assessable by virtue of business succession; accordingly reassessment could proceed. Further, substituted service by affixing notices at the firm&#039;s last known business premises satisfies the statutory standard when personal service efforts fail and is supported by an affixture report; such service does not vitiate jurisdiction. Operatively, both the challenge to identity of the assessee and the challenge to the mode of service fail, permitting reassessment under the statute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 17:08:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (1) TMI 25 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173623</link>
      <description>Where a business continued without discontinuance and was succeeded by an individual, a notice under section 34(1) addressed to the firm remains a valid assessment notice and the successor is assessable by virtue of business succession; accordingly reassessment could proceed. Further, substituted service by affixing notices at the firm&#039;s last known business premises satisfies the statutory standard when personal service efforts fail and is supported by an affixture report; such service does not vitiate jurisdiction. Operatively, both the challenge to identity of the assessee and the challenge to the mode of service fail, permitting reassessment under the statute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>