<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1382 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173618</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned judgment, and quashed the complaint and any proceedings initiated pursuant to it. The Court emphasized that the hire purchase agreement&#039;s terms provided the appellants the right to repossess the vehicle, and no criminal offence was made out against them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1382 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173618</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned judgment, and quashed the complaint and any proceedings initiated pursuant to it. The Court emphasized that the hire purchase agreement&#039;s terms provided the appellants the right to repossess the vehicle, and no criminal offence was made out against them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>