<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 535 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173617</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court overturned the High Court&#039;s decision, ruling that a candidate from a Naga tribe, not recognized as a Scheduled Tribe in Uttar Pradesh, could not claim reservation benefits in the state. Emphasizing the state-specific nature of reservation benefits, the Court highlighted that migrants cannot automatically avail of such benefits in a new state. The Court directed the candidate to be considered in the general category for appointment, stressing the importance of adhering to state-specific recognition for reservation benefits and preventing migrants from claiming benefits not applicable in their new state.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 535 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173617</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court overturned the High Court&#039;s decision, ruling that a candidate from a Naga tribe, not recognized as a Scheduled Tribe in Uttar Pradesh, could not claim reservation benefits in the state. Emphasizing the state-specific nature of reservation benefits, the Court highlighted that migrants cannot automatically avail of such benefits in a new state. The Court directed the candidate to be considered in the general category for appointment, stressing the importance of adhering to state-specific recognition for reservation benefits and preventing migrants from claiming benefits not applicable in their new state.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>