<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 10 - CESTAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325</link>
    <description>Modvat credit remains admissible where duty-paid inputs are received in full and only moisture content evaporates during storage or feeding into manufacture. The applicable scheme treats credit by reference to the duty-paid inputs received in the factory, and negligible process-related moisture loss does not justify denial of credit when the inputs themselves are not lost before use. A contrary authority on loss of inputs was distinguished because it concerned loss of the input itself, not mere evaporation of moisture. The operative principle is that physical non-incorporation of moisture in the final product does not, by itself, defeat credit on the received duty-paid input.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 10 - CESTAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325</link>
      <description>Modvat credit remains admissible where duty-paid inputs are received in full and only moisture content evaporates during storage or feeding into manufacture. The applicable scheme treats credit by reference to the duty-paid inputs received in the factory, and negligible process-related moisture loss does not justify denial of credit when the inputs themselves are not lost before use. A contrary authority on loss of inputs was distinguished because it concerned loss of the input itself, not mere evaporation of moisture. The operative principle is that physical non-incorporation of moisture in the final product does not, by itself, defeat credit on the received duty-paid input.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>