<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 346 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173614</link>
    <description>Articles 341 and 342 make Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe notifications State-specific, so the protective status operates only in relation to the State or Union Territory for which the caste or tribe is specified. Migration to another State does not enlarge the territorial reach of that Presidential notification, even where a caste or tribe of the same nomenclature is also notified there. The constitutional scheme recognises that backwardness and the need for reservation may differ from State to State, and the right to move and settle anywhere in India does not carry reservation benefits across State lines. The earlier Constitution Bench position was reaffirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 May 2017 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 346 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173614</link>
      <description>Articles 341 and 342 make Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe notifications State-specific, so the protective status operates only in relation to the State or Union Territory for which the caste or tribe is specified. Migration to another State does not enlarge the territorial reach of that Presidential notification, even where a caste or tribe of the same nomenclature is also notified there. The constitutional scheme recognises that backwardness and the need for reservation may differ from State to State, and the right to move and settle anywhere in India does not carry reservation benefits across State lines. The earlier Constitution Bench position was reaffirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>