<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 713 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173613</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal filed by BIL and dismissed the appeals filed by the Revenue. It concluded that JRE was an independent manufacturer, and the relationship between JRE and BIL was on a principal-to-principal basis. The assessable value was determined based on the price charged by JRE to BIL, and the deductions claimed by BIL were upheld. The conversion of JRE into JRCE did not alter the relationship, and the assessments were finalized without imposing penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:02:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 713 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173613</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal filed by BIL and dismissed the appeals filed by the Revenue. It concluded that JRE was an independent manufacturer, and the relationship between JRE and BIL was on a principal-to-principal basis. The assessable value was determined based on the price charged by JRE to BIL, and the deductions claimed by BIL were upheld. The conversion of JRE into JRCE did not alter the relationship, and the assessments were finalized without imposing penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>