<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (8) TMI 112 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173608</link>
    <description>Bribery under the election law is confined to inducement linked to statutory withdrawal of candidature, not a mere slackening of campaigning after the withdrawal period. Free conveyance of electors is a corrupt practice where a vehicle is procured for that purpose with the candidate&#039;s consent or through an agent, and liability depends on reliable proof. On the facts discussed, the alleged payment for withdrawal and the canvassing assistance by a serviceman were treated as unproved, while the use of Truck No. HRR 7101 for transporting voters was accepted as a proved instance of corrupt practice. The commentary also notes that corrupt practice allegations must be strictly proved on trustworthy evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 14:40:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (8) TMI 112 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173608</link>
      <description>Bribery under the election law is confined to inducement linked to statutory withdrawal of candidature, not a mere slackening of campaigning after the withdrawal period. Free conveyance of electors is a corrupt practice where a vehicle is procured for that purpose with the candidate&#039;s consent or through an agent, and liability depends on reliable proof. On the facts discussed, the alleged payment for withdrawal and the canvassing assistance by a serviceman were treated as unproved, while the use of Truck No. HRR 7101 for transporting voters was accepted as a proved instance of corrupt practice. The commentary also notes that corrupt practice allegations must be strictly proved on trustworthy evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>