<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1026 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173606</link>
    <description>A finding that a person was not married to Lakshmi could not be sustained without notice to her, because a declaration affecting marital status must comply with natural justice. On that basis, the respondent could not be treated as the appellant&#039;s legally wedded wife on the existing record for maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. The article also explains that a live-in arrangement is protected under the Domestic Violence Act only if it amounts to a relationship in the nature of marriage, judged by indicia such as social recognition as spouses, legal capacity, voluntariness, significant cohabitation and a shared household. Mere casual or purely sexual association does not qualify, and the matter required reconsideration after notice to Lakshmi.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 08:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1026 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173606</link>
      <description>A finding that a person was not married to Lakshmi could not be sustained without notice to her, because a declaration affecting marital status must comply with natural justice. On that basis, the respondent could not be treated as the appellant&#039;s legally wedded wife on the existing record for maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. The article also explains that a live-in arrangement is protected under the Domestic Violence Act only if it amounts to a relationship in the nature of marriage, judged by indicia such as social recognition as spouses, legal capacity, voluntariness, significant cohabitation and a shared household. Mere casual or purely sexual association does not qualify, and the matter required reconsideration after notice to Lakshmi.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>