https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173601 For limitation under Article 182 of the Limitation Act, the term "appeal" was treated in its ordinary and extended sense to include a revision petition, so the order disposing of the revision supplied the starting point for limitation. The prior execution application was also regarded as being in accordance with law because it substantially sought execution against the legal representative of the deceased judgment-debtor, and defects in form did not defeat it. The rejection order was a final order since it terminated the execution proceeding before that court, even without a merits determination. On that basis, the later execution application was within time. en-us Fri, 06 Nov 1936 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:35:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173601 For limitation under Article 182 of the Limitation Act, the term "appeal" was treated in its ordinary and extended sense to include a revision petition, so the order disposing of the revision supplied the starting point for limitation. The prior execution application was also regarded as being in accordance with law because it substantially sought execution against the legal representative of the deceased judgment-debtor, and defects in form did not defeat it. The rejection order was a final order since it terminated the execution proceeding before that court, even without a merits determination. On that basis, the later execution application was within time. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Nov 1936 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173601