https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173601 The Court held that the term "appeal" in Article 182(2) of the Limitation Act includes revision petitions, with the date of the High Court's order in revision being the starting point for limitation. The execution application was found to be valid despite minor defects, and the order rejecting it was considered a final order. As a result, the present execution application was not time-barred, leading to the case being remanded for further proceedings. The judgment stressed the need for a consistent interpretation and practical application of legal provisions to prevent contradictory outcomes. en-us Fri, 06 Nov 1936 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:35:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173601 The Court held that the term "appeal" in Article 182(2) of the Limitation Act includes revision petitions, with the date of the High Court's order in revision being the starting point for limitation. The execution application was found to be valid despite minor defects, and the order rejecting it was considered a final order. As a result, the present execution application was not time-barred, leading to the case being remanded for further proceedings. The judgment stressed the need for a consistent interpretation and practical application of legal provisions to prevent contradictory outcomes. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Nov 1936 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173601