<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 416 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173600</link>
    <description>Civil appeal in a customs matter records that the appeal was dismissed; the reported entry provides no substantive reasoning or legal analysis and does not state any specific legal principle applied. The document cites the dismissal of the appeal in Collector v Sewing Systems (customs), noting the appellate outcome without elaboration or precedent-level holding, and thus serves only as a citation of an affirmed dismissal rather than a source of legal doctrine. SC referenced in citation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:31:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 416 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173600</link>
      <description>Civil appeal in a customs matter records that the appeal was dismissed; the reported entry provides no substantive reasoning or legal analysis and does not state any specific legal principle applied. The document cites the dismissal of the appeal in Collector v Sewing Systems (customs), noting the appellate outcome without elaboration or precedent-level holding, and thus serves only as a citation of an affirmed dismissal rather than a source of legal doctrine. SC referenced in citation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>