https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173592 The Supreme Court declined to exercise its extraordinary equitable jurisdiction under Article 136 because the Union of India relied on a ground that was not available to it. The Court noted that the asserted basis in the memo of appeal appeared to rest on pending departmental appeals in various High Courts, but no verifying affidavit was filed despite an opportunity being given, and counsel suggested the ground may have been mistakenly taken. In these circumstances, the Court held that the Union had not shown entitlement to extraordinary relief and dismissed the special leave petition on that singular basis. en-us Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 Aug 2017 09:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173592 The Supreme Court declined to exercise its extraordinary equitable jurisdiction under Article 136 because the Union of India relied on a ground that was not available to it. The Court noted that the asserted basis in the memo of appeal appeared to rest on pending departmental appeals in various High Courts, but no verifying affidavit was filed despite an opportunity being given, and counsel suggested the ground may have been mistakenly taken. In these circumstances, the Court held that the Union had not shown entitlement to extraordinary relief and dismissed the special leave petition on that singular basis. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173592