<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 838 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264170</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the manufacturer-exporters&#039; refund claim for service tax paid on specified services used for export, emphasizing the payment of service tax, service receipt, and proper invoice details as crucial factors for admissibility. The impugned orders were set aside, allowing the appeals with consequential relief in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 838 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264170</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the manufacturer-exporters&#039; refund claim for service tax paid on specified services used for export, emphasizing the payment of service tax, service receipt, and proper invoice details as crucial factors for admissibility. The impugned orders were set aside, allowing the appeals with consequential relief in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>