https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264158 The High Court remanded the case to the Tribunal for further review regarding the permission granted for yarn clearance, emphasizing the necessity for a detailed assessment of the Assistant Commissioner's authorization and its effect on the assessee's entitlement under Notification No. 43/2001-CE NT. The Court stressed the importance of factual inquiries in determining benefit eligibility under notifications and the significance of procedural adherence in excise issues. en-us Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Oct 2015 11:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264158 The High Court remanded the case to the Tribunal for further review regarding the permission granted for yarn clearance, emphasizing the necessity for a detailed assessment of the Assistant Commissioner's authorization and its effect on the assessee's entitlement under Notification No. 43/2001-CE NT. The Court stressed the importance of factual inquiries in determining benefit eligibility under notifications and the significance of procedural adherence in excise issues. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264158