<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 806 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264138</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the CIT (Appeals) and ITAT, dismissing the appeal by the Income Tax Department. The Court ruled that the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) should be added back to the gross total income of the assessee for the purpose of deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Act. It was emphasized that the disallowance did not alter the nature of income but impacted the calculation of eligible income for deduction purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 806 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264138</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the CIT (Appeals) and ITAT, dismissing the appeal by the Income Tax Department. The Court ruled that the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) should be added back to the gross total income of the assessee for the purpose of deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Act. It was emphasized that the disallowance did not alter the nature of income but impacted the calculation of eligible income for deduction purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>