<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 801 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264133</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee for statistical purposes and dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. The tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to recompute the arm&#039;s length price after excluding certain comparables and deleted the disallowance of professional fees. The issue of unexplained expenditure was remanded back to the assessing officer for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 06:45:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 801 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264133</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee for statistical purposes and dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. The tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to recompute the arm&#039;s length price after excluding certain comparables and deleted the disallowance of professional fees. The issue of unexplained expenditure was remanded back to the assessing officer for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>