<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (7) TMI 40 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173591</link>
    <description>The court held that the amount received by the assessee was taxable as capital gains, as there was a sale or transfer of managing agency rights. However, the court found that the capital gains were not correctly computed and ordered a fresh computation, overturning the previous decision. The assessee was directed to pay half of the costs incurred by the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 18:31:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (7) TMI 40 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173591</link>
      <description>The court held that the amount received by the assessee was taxable as capital gains, as there was a sale or transfer of managing agency rights. However, the court found that the capital gains were not correctly computed and ordered a fresh computation, overturning the previous decision. The assessee was directed to pay half of the costs incurred by the department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>