<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 912 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173584</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the civil appeal was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no ground on the facts to admit the appeal and dismissed it accordingly. The operative effect was that the matter did not proceed further, as the court declined to entertain the appeal after condoning delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 912 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173584</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the civil appeal was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no ground on the facts to admit the appeal and dismissed it accordingly. The operative effect was that the matter did not proceed further, as the court declined to entertain the appeal after condoning delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>