<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 292 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173582</link>
    <description>The text references a Supreme Court central excise civil appeal between a tax collector and an industrial development company, reporting that the civil appeal was dismissed; no statutory interpretation, legal principles, reasoning, operative holdings, or factual findings are supplied in the excerpt. The document is non adjudicatory commentary citing case metadata (citation, bench, date, result) without substantive discussion of legal doctrine or changes to central excise law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:00:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 292 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173582</link>
      <description>The text references a Supreme Court central excise civil appeal between a tax collector and an industrial development company, reporting that the civil appeal was dismissed; no statutory interpretation, legal principles, reasoning, operative holdings, or factual findings are supplied in the excerpt. The document is non adjudicatory commentary citing case metadata (citation, bench, date, result) without substantive discussion of legal doctrine or changes to central excise law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>