<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 330 - CESTAT - Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313</link>
    <description>Reconnection charges collected for reactivating pagers after expiry of the initial subscription period were treated as part of the value of the same radio paging service for service tax purposes. The charges were not regarded as a separate or extraneous receipt, and the Ministry circular dated 20-12-2000 was read as dealing with surcharge rather than reconnection charges. On that basis, the charges fell within the taxable service value and the challenge to their inclusion failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 330 - CESTAT - Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313</link>
      <description>Reconnection charges collected for reactivating pagers after expiry of the initial subscription period were treated as part of the value of the same radio paging service for service tax purposes. The charges were not regarded as a separate or extraneous receipt, and the Ministry circular dated 20-12-2000 was read as dealing with surcharge rather than reconnection charges. On that basis, the charges fell within the taxable service value and the challenge to their inclusion failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>