<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 940 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173575</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the exporter, allowing the appeal against the imposition of redemption fine as the goods were not available for export under any bond. The penalty on the Customs House Agent (CHA) was waived as they acted on behalf of the exporter, and the penalty on the shipping line was reduced due to technical breach, citing the Customs Act. All three appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:02:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 940 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173575</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the exporter, allowing the appeal against the imposition of redemption fine as the goods were not available for export under any bond. The penalty on the Customs House Agent (CHA) was waived as they acted on behalf of the exporter, and the penalty on the shipping line was reduced due to technical breach, citing the Customs Act. All three appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>