https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173551 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a chemical manufacturing entity, in an appeal against a demand for Service Tax categorized as Consulting Engineer Service under Section 65(31) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal considered the definition of Consulting Engineer Service and a precedent set by the Karnataka High Court, determining that manufacturing entities were not covered under this service. Consequently, the demand was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, granting the appellant any consequential relief as per the law. en-us Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:01:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173551 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a chemical manufacturing entity, in an appeal against a demand for Service Tax categorized as Consulting Engineer Service under Section 65(31) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal considered the definition of Consulting Engineer Service and a precedent set by the Karnataka High Court, determining that manufacturing entities were not covered under this service. Consequently, the demand was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, granting the appellant any consequential relief as per the law. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173551