https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173550 Non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition under section 35F led to dismissal of the appeal. The appellant had not deposited the amount directed by the earlier stay order, and the waiver granted to the other applicants was expressly conditional on compliance by the main appellant. As that condition was not fulfilled, the statutory pre-deposit requirement remained unsatisfied, and the appeal was dismissed. en-us Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173550 Non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition under section 35F led to dismissal of the appeal. The appellant had not deposited the amount directed by the earlier stay order, and the waiver granted to the other applicants was expressly conditional on compliance by the main appellant. As that condition was not fulfilled, the statutory pre-deposit requirement remained unsatisfied, and the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173550