<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 710 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173541</link>
    <description>The court quashed the detention orders due to inordinate and unexplained delay in issuance, failure to consider all relevant documents, and lack of proper application of mind by the detaining authority. Emphasizing the protection of the fundamental right to personal liberty and adherence to constitutional safeguards, the court ordered the release of the detenus, highlighting the necessity for preventive detention laws to strike a balance between public order and individual liberties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 23:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 710 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173541</link>
      <description>The court quashed the detention orders due to inordinate and unexplained delay in issuance, failure to consider all relevant documents, and lack of proper application of mind by the detaining authority. Emphasizing the protection of the fundamental right to personal liberty and adherence to constitutional safeguards, the court ordered the release of the detenus, highlighting the necessity for preventive detention laws to strike a balance between public order and individual liberties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>