<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 994 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173529</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the department&#039;s revision, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 54(1)(14) of the VAT Act for the assessment year 2009-10. The Court emphasized the technical nature of the mistake, absence of malafide intention, and lack of revenue loss, highlighting the importance of mens rea in penalty cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:01:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 994 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173529</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the department&#039;s revision, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 54(1)(14) of the VAT Act for the assessment year 2009-10. The Court emphasized the technical nature of the mistake, absence of malafide intention, and lack of revenue loss, highlighting the importance of mens rea in penalty cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>