<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 907 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173555</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against demand confirmation of Rs. 62,78,488/- with interest, as it found no non-payment of Service Tax and upheld the right of branch offices to avail credit for input services. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act was not applicable since there was no failure to pay Service Tax, ultimately dismissing the appeal on this issue as well.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:01:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 907 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173555</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against demand confirmation of Rs. 62,78,488/- with interest, as it found no non-payment of Service Tax and upheld the right of branch offices to avail credit for input services. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act was not applicable since there was no failure to pay Service Tax, ultimately dismissing the appeal on this issue as well.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>