<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 904 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173552</link>
    <description>The appeal by a Merchant-Exporter for a refund claim related to Clearing and Forwarding and courier services used in export was dismissed. The rejection of the refund claim due to failure to file the mandatory declaration in Form A-2 for STC code allotment was upheld. Despite arguments of denial of natural justice, the rejection was deemed valid as the appellant did not comply with the declaration requirement. The Adjudicating Authority affirmed the rejection, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s ineligibility to apply for a refund without fulfilling the necessary declaration. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the rejection of the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:01:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 904 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173552</link>
      <description>The appeal by a Merchant-Exporter for a refund claim related to Clearing and Forwarding and courier services used in export was dismissed. The rejection of the refund claim due to failure to file the mandatory declaration in Form A-2 for STC code allotment was upheld. Despite arguments of denial of natural justice, the rejection was deemed valid as the appellant did not comply with the declaration requirement. The Adjudicating Authority affirmed the rejection, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s ineligibility to apply for a refund without fulfilling the necessary declaration. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the rejection of the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>