<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1045 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173566</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the cross-objections of the assessee. The disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS was upheld, considering the payments as royalty. The addition towards unexplained loan credits was dismissed as the credits were from previous years. The credit for TDS was allowed to be claimed in the year the income is assessed to tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 18:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1045 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173566</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the cross-objections of the assessee. The disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS was upheld, considering the payments as royalty. The addition towards unexplained loan credits was dismissed as the credits were from previous years. The credit for TDS was allowed to be claimed in the year the income is assessed to tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>