https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173520 The appeal was dismissed as it had become infructuous and lacked merit. The High Court's judgment was upheld, finding that the rule in Rameshwar's case was not applicable due to distinguishable facts. The transfers were deemed collusive and benami, with no rights conferred to the transferees. The Assistant Collector's order was found to lack jurisdiction in not involving the original landholder's legal heirs. The death of the landholder altered the tenant's rights under Section 18(1) of the Act, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal without costs. en-us Wed, 05 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:44:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173520 The appeal was dismissed as it had become infructuous and lacked merit. The High Court's judgment was upheld, finding that the rule in Rameshwar's case was not applicable due to distinguishable facts. The transfers were deemed collusive and benami, with no rights conferred to the transferees. The Assistant Collector's order was found to lack jurisdiction in not involving the original landholder's legal heirs. The death of the landholder altered the tenant's rights under Section 18(1) of the Act, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173520