https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173520 Filing an application for purchase under Section 18(1) of the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 did not by itself create any vested or accrued right, because no deposit was made under Section 18(4)(a) and the statutory fiction under Section 18(4)(b) never arose. The applicants therefore had only a liberty to apply, not an enforceable entitlement, and later events such as the landowner's death and the consequent change in the heirs' status could be considered. The earlier precedent involving a vested statutory right was inapplicable. Since the connected judgment on the same issue had already attained finality, no effective relief remained and the appeal failed. en-us Wed, 05 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:44:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173520 Filing an application for purchase under Section 18(1) of the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 did not by itself create any vested or accrued right, because no deposit was made under Section 18(4)(a) and the statutory fiction under Section 18(4)(b) never arose. The applicants therefore had only a liberty to apply, not an enforceable entitlement, and later events such as the landowner's death and the consequent change in the heirs' status could be considered. The earlier precedent involving a vested statutory right was inapplicable. Since the connected judgment on the same issue had already attained finality, no effective relief remained and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173520