https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173517 A decree for specific performance remains under the court's control, and where the purchaser does not pay within a reasonable time and shows unwillingness to complete the bargain, rescission may be ordered even if no fixed time is stated in the decree. The Court held that no accrued right to rescind survived repeal of section 35 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, and section 28 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 was inapplicable, but the application was maintainable under the court's continuing jurisdiction over the decree. Alleged attachments and lien claims did not bar rescission. The appeal succeeded and the decree for specific performance was rescinded. en-us Thu, 09 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:08:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173517 A decree for specific performance remains under the court's control, and where the purchaser does not pay within a reasonable time and shows unwillingness to complete the bargain, rescission may be ordered even if no fixed time is stated in the decree. The Court held that no accrued right to rescind survived repeal of section 35 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877, and section 28 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 was inapplicable, but the application was maintainable under the court's continuing jurisdiction over the decree. Alleged attachments and lien claims did not bar rescission. The appeal succeeded and the decree for specific performance was rescinded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173517