<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (3) TMI 90 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173517</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the judgment under appeal was set aside. The Court ordered the rescission of the decree for specific performance passed in Suit No. 600 of 1961. The receiver was directed to produce the 2,295 shares before the Court and give custody of the same to the Registrar, who would then hand them over to the appellant. The appellant was awarded costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:08:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (3) TMI 90 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173517</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the judgment under appeal was set aside. The Court ordered the rescission of the decree for specific performance passed in Suit No. 600 of 1961. The receiver was directed to produce the 2,295 shares before the Court and give custody of the same to the Registrar, who would then hand them over to the appellant. The appellant was awarded costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>