<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (5) TMI 175 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173511</link>
    <description>Administrative withholding of a statutory subsidy must be supported by relevant, reliable material and by a lawful basis for doubting compliance with the applicable control order. The text explains that certificates from the statutory inspection machinery were not shown to have been lawfully discredited, while a separate study relied on by the authorities was directed to a different purpose and did not establish breach. It also notes that, although courts normally avoid intervening at the show-cause stage, intervention may be justified where the notice rests on no credible material and continued administrative action would be arbitrary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:30:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (5) TMI 175 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173511</link>
      <description>Administrative withholding of a statutory subsidy must be supported by relevant, reliable material and by a lawful basis for doubting compliance with the applicable control order. The text explains that certificates from the statutory inspection machinery were not shown to have been lawfully discredited, while a separate study relied on by the authorities was directed to a different purpose and did not establish breach. It also notes that, although courts normally avoid intervening at the show-cause stage, intervention may be justified where the notice rests on no credible material and continued administrative action would be arbitrary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>