https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173510 Challenge to a special recruitment scheme failed where the selected candidates, whose appointments were directly affected, were not impleaded, making the tribunal's decision vulnerable for non-joinder of necessary parties. The State's proviso authorising prescription of special selection criteria under the recruitment rules was upheld because it remained within valid rule-making power and did not involve excessive delegation or breach of consultation. The prescribed educational qualifications were found neither arbitrary nor discriminatory, as higher training standards were rationally linked to the post and scheme requirements. Recruitment through Employment Exchange sponsorship was also held valid in the context of a time-bound scheme, and the amendments, circulars, selections, and appointments were sustained. en-us Mon, 01 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jun 2016 18:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173510 Challenge to a special recruitment scheme failed where the selected candidates, whose appointments were directly affected, were not impleaded, making the tribunal's decision vulnerable for non-joinder of necessary parties. The State's proviso authorising prescription of special selection criteria under the recruitment rules was upheld because it remained within valid rule-making power and did not involve excessive delegation or breach of consultation. The prescribed educational qualifications were found neither arbitrary nor discriminatory, as higher training standards were rationally linked to the post and scheme requirements. Recruitment through Employment Exchange sponsorship was also held valid in the context of a time-bound scheme, and the amendments, circulars, selections, and appointments were sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173510