https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173508 The Supreme Court held that alterations made by the respondent, including lowering the floor level, front door, staircase, and Chabutra, constituted material alterations under s. 3(1)(c) of the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act. The High Court's decision was overturned, and the eviction order granted by the First Additional Civil Judge was restored. The respondent was directed to pay costs to the appellants. en-us Wed, 12 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:18:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173508 The Supreme Court held that alterations made by the respondent, including lowering the floor level, front door, staircase, and Chabutra, constituted material alterations under s. 3(1)(c) of the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act. The High Court's decision was overturned, and the eviction order granted by the First Additional Civil Judge was restored. The respondent was directed to pay costs to the appellants. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Oct 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173508