<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 789 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264121</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demands, interest, and penalties against the appellant for failing to discharge the service tax liability on amounts received for aerobics and yoga classes. Additionally, the invocation of the extended period for demand of service tax was deemed valid due to the appellant&#039;s lack of cooperation and awareness of their service classification. The impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 789 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264121</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demands, interest, and penalties against the appellant for failing to discharge the service tax liability on amounts received for aerobics and yoga classes. Additionally, the invocation of the extended period for demand of service tax was deemed valid due to the appellant&#039;s lack of cooperation and awareness of their service classification. The impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>