<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 787 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264119</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal solely on the ground of limitation, setting aside the demands, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellant for failure to pay service tax on &#039;installation and Commissioning of Plant and Equipment&#039; services. The Tribunal held that the invocation of the extended period for demanding service tax was beyond the limitation period, referencing judgments from the High Courts of Bombay and Karnataka. The decision focused on the limitation issue, disregarding other arguments raised by both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 787 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264119</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal solely on the ground of limitation, setting aside the demands, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellant for failure to pay service tax on &#039;installation and Commissioning of Plant and Equipment&#039; services. The Tribunal held that the invocation of the extended period for demanding service tax was beyond the limitation period, referencing judgments from the High Courts of Bombay and Karnataka. The decision focused on the limitation issue, disregarding other arguments raised by both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>