<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 783 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264115</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of two appeals as time-barred but remanded three appeals for further assessment of export rebate. It emphasized the importance of service classification and relevant date for rebate claims under the Export of Services Rules, 2005.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 08:07:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 783 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264115</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of two appeals as time-barred but remanded three appeals for further assessment of export rebate. It emphasized the importance of service classification and relevant date for rebate claims under the Export of Services Rules, 2005.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>