<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 775 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264107</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal challenging the CESTAT order requiring a pre-deposit of Rs. 4 crores and Rs. 10 lakhs against a total demand of Rs. 12,96,41,817 for alleged evasion of central excise duty. The appellants&#039; claims of financial hardship and procedural unfairness were rejected, with the court emphasizing the need to safeguard revenue interests. The appellants were given one month to deposit the specified amount, failing which the appeal before the CESTAT would be dismissed, while clarifying that its findings would not influence the CESTAT&#039;s independent review of the appeal on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 775 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264107</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal challenging the CESTAT order requiring a pre-deposit of Rs. 4 crores and Rs. 10 lakhs against a total demand of Rs. 12,96,41,817 for alleged evasion of central excise duty. The appellants&#039; claims of financial hardship and procedural unfairness were rejected, with the court emphasizing the need to safeguard revenue interests. The appellants were given one month to deposit the specified amount, failing which the appeal before the CESTAT would be dismissed, while clarifying that its findings would not influence the CESTAT&#039;s independent review of the appeal on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>