<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 9 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of a penalty on a Management Consultant for late payment of service tax, despite the appellant&#039;s argument that depositing the tax with interest should exempt them from penalties. The Tribunal ruled that ignorance of the law is not a valid excuse and emphasized the importance of compliance with tax obligations. The appellant was directed to pay a penalty of Rs. 75,000 within eight weeks, highlighting the significance of adhering to tax laws to avoid penalties under the Service Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 9 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of a penalty on a Management Consultant for late payment of service tax, despite the appellant&#039;s argument that depositing the tax with interest should exempt them from penalties. The Tribunal ruled that ignorance of the law is not a valid excuse and emphasized the importance of compliance with tax obligations. The appellant was directed to pay a penalty of Rs. 75,000 within eight weeks, highlighting the significance of adhering to tax laws to avoid penalties under the Service Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>