https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264105 The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the CESTAT's decision in favor of the Respondent, finding no merit in the Appellant's challenge to the setting aside of the Commissioner's order. The Court rejected the Appellant's arguments regarding the misinterpretation of evidence and affirmed the Tribunal's findings on duty payments for Polyester and Viscose Yarn, emphasizing the need for separate assessments. The allegations of clandestine removal of goods were refuted based on discrepancies in the balance sheet evidence, leading to the rejection of the appeal. en-us Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Oct 2015 10:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264105 The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the CESTAT's decision in favor of the Respondent, finding no merit in the Appellant's challenge to the setting aside of the Commissioner's order. The Court rejected the Appellant's arguments regarding the misinterpretation of evidence and affirmed the Tribunal's findings on duty payments for Polyester and Viscose Yarn, emphasizing the need for separate assessments. The allegations of clandestine removal of goods were refuted based on discrepancies in the balance sheet evidence, leading to the rejection of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264105