https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264105 The commentary discusses a remand directed reconsideration of duty liability on viscose yarn by reference to total manufacture during the relevant period, noting that the earlier appellate order had not finally closed that question. It also examines a clandestine removal allegation and records that the finding could not stand where the balance sheet showed closing stock not addressed by the adjudicating authority and no material discredited those entries. On that record, the demand and penalty were described as unsustainable, with no interference called for with the Tribunal's order. en-us Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Oct 2015 10:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264105 The commentary discusses a remand directed reconsideration of duty liability on viscose yarn by reference to total manufacture during the relevant period, noting that the earlier appellate order had not finally closed that question. It also examines a clandestine removal allegation and records that the finding could not stand where the balance sheet showed closing stock not addressed by the adjudicating authority and no material discredited those entries. On that record, the demand and penalty were described as unsustainable, with no interference called for with the Tribunal's order. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264105