<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 747 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264079</link>
    <description>The Assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition on account of undervaluation of closing stock and disallowed weaving majuri expenses were reduced from 20% to 10%. The Tribunal remitted the issue of disallowance of interest expenses back to the AO for re-examination based on the availability of interest-free funds. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of accurate comparisons, proper documentation, and justified disallowances in assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 747 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264079</link>
      <description>The Assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition on account of undervaluation of closing stock and disallowed weaving majuri expenses were reduced from 20% to 10%. The Tribunal remitted the issue of disallowance of interest expenses back to the AO for re-examination based on the availability of interest-free funds. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of accurate comparisons, proper documentation, and justified disallowances in assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>